Here’s my brief answer: Of course Game of Thrones is racist. Rather, of course the show’s various ethnic groups and clans are differentiated by their appearance and behavior, and of course some end up looking and acting more barbarous than others as a result. I’ll go one further: All of the characters in Game of Thrones are racist as well, and few if any suffer even the slightest admonishment for it. But wouldn’t it be queer indeed if the residents of the Western part of an Iron Age fantasy world thought that distant (and often belligerent) cultures with strange, alien habits were to be celebrated for their uniqueness? As my friend put it, imagine the schoolkids in the capital city of Kings Landing making posters to commemorate Dothraki History Week.I've seen the first episode of Game, but since I'm unacquainted with the books its based on, I came away wondering if I was supposed to buy a study guide because I had no idea what was going on. Still, I find Mr Foster's take refreshing. "Racism" is like "Fascist"; a word that has been so overused and so broadly applied that today it means "Something I don't like". I've often worried that the insane crush of political correctness might result in a violent reaction by society to shrug it off when it becomes too oppressive. However,. Mr Foster presents another and I think preferable alternative: Indifference. When the term racism is used to cover everything from genocide to a reasonable desire for free association and demands minimum terms of redress that are indistinguishable from cultural suicide, then it ceases to have any serious meaning. In that case, the only reply to be expected to the accusation is, "Racist? I suppose. So what?"
That may not help much at a
1 comment:
Superlative analysis as always David. Frankly, the "racist" comment should be turned around on the one who initiates it, since such small-minded people are also typically guilty of projection of their own prejudices onto others.
Post a Comment