Wednesday 28 June 2006

Mining Project

The Telegraph recently ran a story about a new shaped-charge mine, apparently developed and supplied by Iran, which is being used with lethal effect by terrorists against British troops in Iraq and which neatly dovetails with the first of Christopher Hitchens' four projects for anti-war activists.

What about the land mines? A few years ago, a fairly broad consensus was achieved, to the effect that land mines should be regarded as an illegal and immoral method of warfare. Jody Williams and her group received a Nobel Peace Prize for their work on the question, and Princess Diana became an international star on the subject. The Clinton administration declined to sign the treaty, mainly on the grounds that a huge number of American land mines guard the so-called demilitarized (actually very highly militarized) zone that helps protect South Korea from a "dear leader" attack. But nobody is going to wander innocently into that zone. Whereas in Iraq and Afghanistan, every day dozens of these devices—sometimes known as "improvised explosive devices," or IEDs—are buried where anyone can step on them or be blown up by them. We have persuasive evidence that Iran and Syria have contributed some sophisticated explosives to the gruesome business. Would not now be the time to demand that the international community denounce land-mine atrocities and—especially the states that underwrite them? Anyone who has ever uttered the phrase "civilian casualties" has a particular obligation here.
Any takers?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The phrase "never bring a knife to a gunfight" springs to mind. Intentionally handicapping oneself in the face of the enemy is not a tactic conducive to victory.