Monday 14 July 2008

Midnight

Who cares about Derek Zoolander anyway? The man has only one look, for Christ's sake! Blue Steel? Ferrari? Le Tigra? They're the same face! Doesn't anybody notice this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!
Mugatu

I feel Mugatu's pain. Reading reviews of "Midnight", the Doctor Who episode that aired in the US on Friday, I keep having the feeling that I must have a television that receives broadcasts from an alternate dimension. It's been called the best episode of this series, Davies' finest work, a classic, a brilliant claustrophobic gem and God knows what else.

Let's just step back a bit. We are talking about the episode where the Doctor leaves the dreadful Donna on the sun deck of an interstellar resort sometime in the future while he goes on a day trip in a tour bus only to have an alien "something" rip the driver's cabin off and possess one of the passengers, which causes the other tourists to descend into snarling paranoia? That the one?

No, can't be. That was, in technical terms, a steaming load of poo. We'll pass over Davies' standard missteps, such as the strange idea that, no matter what time period, people in the future will dress in 21st century clothes; the gratuitous homosexual reference; the collection of "realistic" characters treated with patent condescension by the writer who don't fit the setting or story at all, "moments" that has bloody all to do with the plot and just bring it crashing to a halt; or this season's annoying teasers for the Big Secret later on that no one will give a toss about when All Is Revealed. The story itself has enough in it to loathe and, amazingly, I wasn't the one to cast the first stone this time (In my defence, we only had it on because my daughter was in the room and I refused to watch Spongebob Squarepants, which I now regret). As the storyline about people fearing what they don't understand and turning into savages unfolded my wife, who has acted in and directed dozens of stage adaptations of the Twilight Zone in Seattle and the Edinburgh Fringe Festival, pointed at the screen and said "It's 'The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street!'"

I couldn't help but agree, except that, heavy handed as Rod Serling had been half a century ago, at least he wrote dialogue for his characters while Davies, apparently went in for (bad) improv with everyone shouting "Stop it!" for half an hour interposed with thespian depths not plumbed since The Blair Witch Project. Then the creepy bit of demonic, sorry, "alien" possession occurred (why should one be any more likely than the other?) and the possessed person (with the appalling name of "Sky") starts repeating what everyone else is saying to her (*cough* Buffy *cough*). Many a review called this a tour de force of acting, though my better half just snorted and said, "Great! Now we're getting first year drama school exercises." And she knows from whence she speaks.

This was the highlight of an episode that wasn't helped by the fact that it merely demonstrated how weak David Tennant's Doctor is compared to previous incarnations. This 10th incarnation can't even control a busload of emotional cripples while Tom Baker's could silence a gaggle of homicidal telepathic priestesses with a glower and a glib word.

It was, however, marked by the new series' trademark of the action pushing forward at a furious pace to cover the fact that the actual plot doesn't move at all, but this this at least covers the fact that a) in the end, the Doctor does absolutely nothing and b) the panicky loudmouth who wanted to shove the possessed woman out the airlock was right all along.

Still, I must give Russell T points for a good moral: "If it looks dangerous, then it probably is, so kill it quick before it gets another shot in."

I don't think that's quite what Mr. Serling had in mind.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

You didn't like it then ?
Maybe it was a Tour de Farce ?
Thanks David for yet another gem.
Micen90

Anonymous said...

Is the Doctor gay? Or are they inching toward him coming out of the closet?

Sergej said...

Good thing I've only been into Star Trek, and not Dr. Who. Not as much pain from debasing of my childhood favorite. Really, the most painful perversions have been most of Enterprise. And Voyager. And ST:TNG. And I never really cared for Deep Space Nine either, come to think of it.

Maybe I should have been more into Dr. Who.

Wunderbear said...

I think that technically, people were correct in saying that it was the best episode that Russell T Davies had written. That it wasn't a total mash of dalek/cyberman slash fanfic and stupidity was an achievement, for him.

Still, I await with glee the series helmed by Moffat (who wrote some of the best episodes of the new serieses, so far)

Anonymous said...

Useful phrase YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary) I rather like David Tennant's Doctor. He comes across, to me anyway, as petulant, tender, driven and an apparently flip exterior concealing a lot of pain. I did like Tom Baker's Doctor a lot too. Some of the time. He could project a powerful, otherworldly, persona. Other times he could serve up a hick slice of ham. Then again YMMV. :-)

Anonymous said...

It would seem that you are now so divorced from the majority of Doctor Who fans & the rest of the viewing public that perhaps it would cause you far less pain to just stop watching the show.
Things will not change under Moffat, the BBC will not let him, and he dosent want to. So you can either go through all of this heart renching ad infenitum or switch off.