The public feels it no longer has the right to interfere.Regarding the riots across England, I think this sums it up best: This is what autonomous individualism looks like in the end. Since the 1960s, Britain has been subjected to a relentless campaign to strip the country of its institutions, its history, its morals, its religion and its very identity. Generations of children have been taught that their country is wicked, that their society is worthless, their history shameful. They've been told there is no right or wrong save what they decide is so. For an entire class of society the family has been all but destroyed and mothers gave birth to a generation of bastards who never even knew their fathers. Industry has been punished. Decency derided. Patriotism mocked. Deference abolished. Chastity forgotten. All authority over them renounced. All of this, mind you, in the bosom of a cradle to grave welfare state that ensures that they never need to work a day in their lives. And what have they been left with? A perverted, feral sense of individualism. Not the individualism of a free man under the law and a being created in God's image, but of a brute answerable to no one and nothing. This wave of looting and burning isn't surprising. We have "children" (some middle aged) who have a massive sense of entitlement, no regard for law, no respect for authority, are bone idle and believe that they have a right to anything they can get away with. And now that the police have shown themselves ineffectual, the government spineless and the populace disarmed, they know they can literally get away with murder. And that is what Britain is bankrupting itself for; to support an underclass of parasitic yahoos whose idea of relieving boredom is to rob and burn those few left who are productive. As for second-generation immigrants who by all accounts made up a staggering percentage of the looters, it's like they've been handed the cultural list and only picked up the worst traits of their hosts. And the females? As the father of a little girl, I can only weep at how they have been sacrificed at an altar more terrible than Baal's.
Yob NationFrancis Gilbert
Back in the 1970s, I recall a story I read in Analog magazine ("Generation Gaps", I think) about a 21st century Earth where the older generation was fleeing to the Moon to escape from a world ruled by hippies who had rebuilt society to their hedonistic liking. The final paragraphs of the story were chilling as the refugees' "children" begged for help as their children in turn adopted cannibalism and vampirism as the newest fad and rose against them in bloody rebellion. It was meant as satire, but watching the videos over the last few days, I'm not so sure.
My wife, who isn't given to such things, pronounced that if Britain cannot rise to this occasion, then it is doomed. I can't help but agree with her, but who have we to deal with this? An ineffectual Political Class that hasn't a clue how the real world works and a police force that is hamstrung by insane, contradictory directives that damn them whatever they do. Watching Cameron et al posturing, acting tough, finger pointing, contradicting one another and desperately hoping that this will all go away is nothing less than sickening for, indeed, that is exactly what they are hoping will happen. The idea that the deadly fruits of the welfare state have finally ripened and begun to fall doesn't occur to them.
That's looking at it at its simplest. This isn't a pressure cooker on the verge of exploding. Add in the foreign tyranny of the EU, the economic crisis, the immigration crisis and the ever-pressing threat of Jihad and you've got a whole warehouse full of pressure cookers next door to a depot load of Semtex, a tanker of petrol and an atomic missile silo.
It also doesn't help that the law abiding have been so thoroughly betrayed. In the 20th century, the state and the people made a compact. In return for disarming, the state promised to protect the people. Since the British are a singularly law-abiding people and largely supported their institutions (British criminals were once notorious for their patriotism), this worked. But when the rot of the welfare state mingled with the cultural poison of the 1960s, that respect faded and the police were emasculated. By the turn of the century, the only ones who had reason to fear the law were the ones who it supposedly existed to protect. Want to see swift justice? Ask a policeman if he knows his horse is gay. The people, in turn, were laid naked before the wolves bred over the past forty odd years.
Things have to change and quickly. How? I don't know. It doesn't mean the Tories out and Labour in. All three main parties are as bad as the other. It means rejecting all of them and dismantling this insular, self-regarding, corrupt Political Class on all levels of government. It means very real, basic reform that this country hasn't seen since 1688. It means undoing decades of deliberate destruction and the rediscovery of who we are. It's to go so far back that we have to go to every old folks home, look the War generation in the eye and apologise to them for what we've done to their country.
But that's for tomorrow. Today we have to look at the lessons we've learned.
The first lesson? Recognise that the police are the police, not social workers in funny clothes. Their purpose is to catch criminals, prevent crime and keep the peace. They are not tasked with "community cohesion" or any of that bilge. Nor are they the armed wing of the Guardian. Their function is to be greeted by the law abiding with relief and the criminal classes with fear. It is not to go after respectable citizens and reeducate them in the proper way of thinking (That is, the Party line) while allowing the yobs to roam and despoil at will.
| 1940 appeal. |
The third lesson is to acknowledge the horrible damage done to British society since the foul revolution of 1968. Admit that the Political Class that replaced the old Establishment is a rotten oligarchy and that the horrors inflicted by them on our morals and our institutions in the name of "reform" and "modernity" have resulted in (among other things) a feral underclass that is as dangerous as it it useless. And that the experiment of mass immigration, moral relativism and multiculturalism is an abject failure. Does that mean turning back the clock? It blasted well does. As G K Chesterton said, "Turning back the clock is the sensible and progressive thing to do when it starts keeping the wrong time".
The clock isn't just keeping the wrong time, some yob has set fire to it.










