Pages

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

Laying a poor foundation

Trying to attack the Conservative leader for allegedly wearing make up in an advert has to be the silliest idea in the history of politics.

Politicians have been wearing make up in front of cameras ever since Richard Nixon refused it when he debated John Kennedy on television and came across as unshaven and sweaty–an image that lost him the election. If nothing else, it's a ploy so open to counterattack that it's a bit like building a bunker out of spun sugar.

3 comments:

  1. I believe they're going for manly-manness. As in, "our candidate is authentically masculine". And I thought androgynous metrosexualness was in this week.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If what Sergej says is true, the next ad can be expected to have the candidate's kids on it, Brown's berating the other by saying; "My dad can find more things to tax than your dad!"

    Apparently the "tough guy" thing is only for campaigns however, much like here in the US

    ReplyDelete
  3. At first sight of that image, I thought "cement overcoat," and it took a bit for the cosmetics angle to register.

    ReplyDelete

Rules for submitting comments:

1. No profanity. I maintain the pretense that this is a family-friendly site.

2. Stay on topic. A bit of straying and off-hand commenting is okay, but hijacking the discussion is right out.

3. No ad hominem attacks. Attack the subject, not the other person on the thread and keep the discussion civil.

4. No spamming or commercial endorsements. These get deleted immediately.

Tip: Beware of putting hyperlinks in your comments–especially at the end. For some reason, Blogger interprets these as spam.

Note: Due to the recent spate of anonymous spamming, registration for comments is now required.