Pages

Tuesday, 24 June 2008

Britain's Do-Nothing Contingency

The Times looks at Britain's so-called contingency plans for military intervention in Zimbabwe that reveals New Labour as a load of gutless wonders more worried about how they are seen by tin-pot African dictators rather than cleaning up the mess their predecessors made of Zimbabwe a generation ago at Lancaster House.

Any grown up nation worth its salt would have had plans that ran along the lines of putting together a special forces task force out of Diego Garcia with the mission of taking out the Mugabe regime in toto while the Foreign Office gave a gentle message to whichever country whose airspace was being crossed that the RAF can go through their defences like butter if they don't cooperate. And if any of the assortment of petty tyrants and kelptocrats who infest central Africa want to call it colonialism, they'd best say it very, very softly.

Unfortunately, Whitehall is in a rather infantile stage that demands that civilised men defer to barbarians and the MoD's plans, such as they are, amount to little more than Britain sitting on its hands while Zimbabwe's neighbours decide whether it's worth deposing a fellow dictator and then watching Her Majesty's armed forces hold Mebki's coattails. Or until hell freezes over, which is far more likely.

I assume that Mr. Brown has a barber shave him, because I cannot imagine how he looks himself in the mirror.

3 comments:

  1. And what if some countries have defences stronger than butter ?
    This is not 1900.
    What will Your next post on the subject be called ?
    World superiority down the memory hole?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think I might agree with the sentiment of a nonny mouse, there.

    Although it's nice to think that Britain is still the strongest country in the world, the truth is that we're not. And acting as such is, at best hubristic, and at worst, downright reckless.

    I know it's nice to think that we're still in our colonial, Empire-building days (I do, if only because pith helmets are fairly natty), but the truth is that we can't just solve problems by crying "SEND IN THE RAF TO BLOW EVERYTHING UP/SEND IN THE SAS TO STAB+SHOOT PEOPLE/SEND IN MARGARET THATCHER TO BEAT THOSE SNOTTY OTHER PEOPLE WITH HER HANDBAG/etc".

    However, I do agree that Mugabe is a mentalist dictator and that the sooner he goes, the better. Just, see what happened last time we waded in?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nonny Mouse at Your service Sir!

    ReplyDelete

Rules for submitting comments:

1. No profanity. I maintain the pretense that this is a family-friendly site.

2. Stay on topic. A bit of straying and off-hand commenting is okay, but hijacking the discussion is right out.

3. No ad hominem attacks. Attack the subject, not the other person on the thread and keep the discussion civil.

4. No spamming or commercial endorsements. These get deleted immediately.

Tip: Beware of putting hyperlinks in your comments–especially at the end. For some reason, Blogger interprets these as spam.

Note: Due to the recent spate of anonymous spamming, registration for comments is now required.