Pages
▼
Monday, 28 May 2012
NASA asks future explorers to respect historic landing sites
2 comments:
Rules for submitting comments:
1. No profanity. I maintain the pretense that this is a family-friendly site.
2. Stay on topic. A bit of straying and off-hand commenting is okay, but hijacking the discussion is right out.
3. No ad hominem attacks. Attack the subject, not the other person on the thread and keep the discussion civil.
4. No spamming or commercial endorsements. These get deleted immediately.
Tip: Beware of putting hyperlinks in your comments–especially at the end. For some reason, Blogger interprets these as spam.
Note: Due to the recent spate of anonymous spamming, registration for comments is now required.

I think somebody at NASA, for once, actually read something other than a John Holdren rant.
ReplyDeleteNamely, international salvage laws. By issuing this request and clearly stating that the ALSEPs are, for the most part, still active, NASA is saying that the Apollo sites and their equipment are not "abandoned in place". And thus, are not legally available to be claimed as legitimate salvage.
Sooner or later, somebody is going to get the bright idea of doing a real-life version of the old Andy Griffith TV show, "Salvage 1". Either manned or, more likely, unmanned.
This statement at least gives NASA some legal recourse if an ALSEP abruptly shows up at Southeby's. Or, for that matter, on eBay.
cheers
eon
I think the landing areas should qualify as historical sites that are off limits to scavengers. The declaration though would have more weight though if the US could declare the sites sovereign (as in the property of the USA) territory. Unfortunately there are a couple of treaties on the books that make that impossible, so we're going to have to depend on the kindness of strangers to protect those historical landmarks. All in all though, it's an interesting problem to have to deal with.
ReplyDelete