 |
| Much easier to hit than a pigeon |
Rules for submitting comments:
1. No profanity. I maintain the pretense that this is a family-friendly site.
2. Stay on topic. A bit of straying and off-hand commenting is okay, but hijacking the discussion is right out.
3. No ad hominem attacks. Attack the subject, not the other person on the thread and keep the discussion civil.
4. No spamming or commercial endorsements. These get deleted immediately.
Tip: Beware of putting hyperlinks in your comments–especially at the end. For some reason, Blogger interprets these as spam.
Note: Due to the recent spate of anonymous spamming, registration for comments is now required.
I think the link's wrong; it takes me to the picture from the "Rinspeed" article
ReplyDeleteLink fixed
ReplyDeleteLooks like they should have invested in a mast mounted sight for that thing.
ReplyDeleteOr just, you know, a periscope?
Shooting at an annoying RPV is, strictly speaking, vandalism. But the self-satisfied, holier-than-thou "animal friends" seem to pride themselves on how obnoxious they can be to grotty humans, so it's not surprising nobody else cares that their shiny new toy got broken.
ReplyDeletecheers
eon
What's the legal position on using an RPV to spy on someone on private property? I would have thought it was quite a serious offence.
ReplyDeletePlus, filming without a permit/ filming people in a private place without their permission.
Cthel: yes, two wrongs do indeed not make a right. I'm sure the judge would say something like that if the hunters turned themselves in after this incident, instead of running off, presumably giggling like schoolgirls. Or, what the judge would say after he himself stopped belly-laughing.
ReplyDelete