![]() |
| Just in case you're curious. |
Pages
▼
Friday, 23 December 2011
Space launches by year
1 comment:
Rules for submitting comments:
1. No profanity. I maintain the pretense that this is a family-friendly site.
2. Stay on topic. A bit of straying and off-hand commenting is okay, but hijacking the discussion is right out.
3. No ad hominem attacks. Attack the subject, not the other person on the thread and keep the discussion civil.
4. No spamming or commercial endorsements. These get deleted immediately.
Tip: Beware of putting hyperlinks in your comments–especially at the end. For some reason, Blogger interprets these as spam.
Note: Due to the recent spate of anonymous spamming, registration for comments is now required.

I still maintain that this handily explains the so-called "Kecksburg, PA, UFO crash". Acorn-shaped, with a rim with weird lines on it (supposedly "runes"?), burnt bronze-colored, and made a semi-soft landing?
ReplyDeleteSounds like the earth-return camera package of a Heavy Zond reconsat to me, complete with the inflatable landing cushion. My guess is the timer that was supposed to trigger the deorbit sequence hiccuped, and fired the retros either one orbit too early, or one too late. Bringing it down in PA instead of Kazakhstan.
It would explain the "government secrecy", too. If an example of your adversary's best cutting-edge tech literally falls into your lap, you don't want him to know you've got it. The whole "UFO" schtick was a cover story money couldn't buy. All the NRO, etc., had to do was shut up and let the UFO-nuts ramble on.
Don't you just love it when a plan comes together?
cheers
eon