Can't decide if you want a flying aircraft carrier, a hybrid airship/aeroplane, or a vacuum propulsion system? Then throw caution to the wind and adopt all three untrested technologies at once.
What could possibly go wrong?
Rules for submitting comments:
1. No profanity. I maintain the pretense that this is a family-friendly site.
2. Stay on topic. A bit of straying and off-hand commenting is okay, but hijacking the discussion is right out.
3. No ad hominem attacks. Attack the subject, not the other person on the thread and keep the discussion civil.
4. No spamming or commercial endorsements. These get deleted immediately.
Tip: Beware of putting hyperlinks in your comments–especially at the end. For some reason, Blogger interprets these as spam.
Note: Due to the recent spate of anonymous spamming, registration for comments is now required.
Of course, if it were actually built, the Powers That Be would conclude that helium was just too rare and expensive to use as lifting gas, and so it would be filled with the much more easily obtained, and much cheaper, hydrogen.
ReplyDeleteSort of the way they decided to use solid rocket boosters instead of a manned, liquid-fueled, flyback lower step as an economy measure on the Space Shuttle. And that worked out so well, just like the tiles.
Moral; Any project has to be not only idiot-proof, but politician-proof. Because politicians are generally even more profoundly stupid than the average idiot.
cheers
eon
Speaking of carriers, is this http://www.edisposals.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/Disposals-Public-Site/en_US/-/GBP/ViewProductDetail-Start;pgid=MieqQ4wkQg8000A a joke? If it isn't, I can see a certain bald headed super villain stroking his Persian cat while reaching for the phone and his credit card.
ReplyDeleteTechnology is too precious a thing to be left at the hands of politicians.
ReplyDelete