If the choice is them continuing [towards a nuclear bomb] or the use of force, I think you're at a Hitler marching into the Rhineland point. If you don't stop it then, the future is in his hands, not in your hands, just as the future decisions on their nuclear programme would be in Iran's hands, not ours.
Rules for submitting comments:
1. No profanity. I maintain the pretense that this is a family-friendly site.
2. Stay on topic. A bit of straying and off-hand commenting is okay, but hijacking the discussion is right out.
3. No ad hominem attacks. Attack the subject, not the other person on the thread and keep the discussion civil.
4. No spamming or commercial endorsements. These get deleted immediately.
Tip: Beware of putting hyperlinks in your comments–especially at the end. For some reason, Blogger interprets these as spam.
Note: Due to the recent spate of anonymous spamming, registration for comments is now required.
I see Amnesty International doesn't say too much about the fact that the alternative to being Tasered is being killed.
ReplyDeleteI guess it's the principle of the thing.
Firstly, wrong topic. Oops! ¬_¬
ReplyDeleteAlso, this is true. But there is a much better alternative; portable PAIN RAYS (that Active Denial System). That would be awesome.
Set ADSes to stun!
(Weird vericode: ugohorib. Sounds tasty.)
I think maybe the point (against the original post) is that if anything is likely to press the Iranian energy-generating red button, it's probably us invading them?
ReplyDelete